![]() Pagan Info | ||||
| Contents | Optimized Tiles | Original Tiles | Pagan Info | Articles |
This evaluation frame was written by P.E.I. Bonewitz. Most neo-Pagan groups are harmless; but some, a few, just like sub-groups within any of the mainstream belief systems, may not be so nice.
QUESTION EVERYTHING! THINK FOR YOURSELF!
CULT DANGER EVALUATION FRAME1-INTERNAL CONTROL: amount of internal political power exercised by the leader(s) over members.
Rate each from 1 to 10, with 1 being Very Low and 10 being Very High1.____________2-WISDOM CLAIMED: by leader(s); amount of infallibility declared about decisions.2.____________3-WISDOM CREDITED: to leader(s) by members; amount of trust in decisions made by leaders.3.____________4-DOGMA: rigidity of reality concepts taught; amount of doctrinal inflexibility.4.____________5-RECRUITING: emphasis put on attracting new members; amount of proselytizing.5.____________6-FRONT GROUPS: number of subsidiary groups using different names from that of main group.6.____________7-WEALTH: amount of money and/or property desired or obtained; emphasis on members' donations.7.____________8-POLITICAL POWER: amount of external political inflience desired or obtained.8.____________9-SEXUAL MANIPULATION: of members by leader(s); amount of control over sex lives of members.9.____________10-CENSORSHIP: amount of control over members' access to outside opinions on group, its doctrines or leader(s).10.____________11-DROPOUT CONTROL: intensity of efforts directed at preventing or returning dropouts.11.____________12-ENDORSEMENT OF VIOLENCE: when used by or for the group or its leader(s).12.____________13-PARANOIA: amount of fear concerning real or imagined enemies; perceived power of opponents.13.____________14-GRIMNESS: amount of disapproval concerning jokes about the group, its doctrine, or leader(s).14.____________